Stop treating `AGI' as the north-star goal of AI research
May 1, 2025·,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,·
0 min read
Borhane Blili-Hamelin
Christopher Graziul
Leif Hancox-Li
Hananel Hazan
El-Mahdi El-Mhamdi
Avijit Ghosh
Katherine Heller
Jacob Metcalf
Fabricio Murai
Eryk Salvaggio
Andrew Smart
Todd Snider
Mariame Tighanimine
Talia Ringer
Margaret Mitchell
Shiri Dori-Hacohen
Abstract
The AI research community plays a vital role in shaping the scientific, engineering, and societal goals of AI research. In this position paper, we argue that focusing on the highly contested topic of
artificial general intelligence' (
AGI’) undermines our ability to choose effective goals. We identify six key traps – obstacles to productive goal setting – that are aggravated by AGI discourse: Illusion of Consensus, Supercharging Bad Science, Presuming Value-Neutrality, Goal Lottery, Generality Debt, and Normalized Exclusion. To avoid these traps, we argue that the AI research community needs to (1) prioritize specificity in engineering and societal goals, (2) center pluralism about multiple worthwhile approaches to multiple valuable goals, and (3) foster innovation through greater inclusion of disciplines and communities. Therefore, the AI research community needs to stop treating `AGI’ as the north-star goal of AI research.Type
Publication
ICML (Position Paper Track; to appear)